{"id":"OESA-2026-3625","summary":"openssl security update","details":"OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.\r\n\r\nSecurity Fix(es):\n\nIssue summary: The OpenSSL Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) caches\nadditional certificates (extraCerts) sent in a CMP message, but never expunges\nthem (for instance if they are invalid).  If a server reuses an OSSL_CMP_CTX\nfrequently, this cache of extraCerts may grow unboundedly, and a malicious\nclient may flood a CMP server with requests driving this growth.\n\nImpact summary: Users utilizing a CMP server that reuses a single OSSL_CMP_CTX\nfor the lifetime of a server process may observe unbounded memory growth in the\nevent a malicious client repeatedly sends requests containing unique extra\ncertificates, which may lead to OOM conditions.\n\nCWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling\n\nDescription: If a remote user sends CMP messages to a server with a list of\nextraCerts and the message is rejected, the extraCerts from the message remains\nin the server contexts untrusted certificate stack.  This exposes servers with\nlong lived ctx objects to Denial of Service attacks in which an attacker sends\nmessages intending to be rejected with a large list of additional certificates\nrepeatedly, forcing the server to store them indefinitely.\n   \nThe issue was fixed by removing the added extra certs if the message is\nrejected, using the same method as when the context is configured to not do\ncaching at all.\n\nFIPS impact: no\nAs the CMP code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS\nmodules are affected by this CVE.(CVE-2026-63074)\n\nIssue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only\nchecks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its\nASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can\ncontain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an\ninvalid pointer.\n\nImpact summary: A remote, unauthenticated attacker can crash an application\nacting as a CMP server that accepts PBM-protected messages, or a CMP client\ntalking to a malicious or intercepted CMP server, resulting in a Denial of\nService.\n\nCWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference\n\nDescription: When verifying the password-based MAC protection of a CMP\nmessage, OpenSSL library reads the protectionAlg algorithm parameter with\nX509_ALGOR_get0(), which returns both the parameter type and its value\npointer. The value is then cast to an ASN1_STRING and treated as the\nexpected PBMParameter after only checking that pointer is not NULL. The\nparameter type returned by X509_ALGOR_get0() was never consulted.\n\nThis happens during protection verification, before any MAC is computed, so\nno knowledge of the PBM shared secret is required; the only precondition is\nthat PBM verification is reachable. On the server side this is reached from\nOSSL_CMP_SRV_process_request() for any application that stands up a CMP\nserver accepting PBM-protected messages, and on the client side from CMP\nresponse validation against a malicious or on-path (MITM) server. The\nreliable consequence is a denial of service; there is no memory disclosure,\nno controlled memory write, and no path to code execution. CMP is a\nspecialized feature that an application must explicitly enable.\n\nFIPS impact: no\nAs the CMP code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules\nare affected by this CVE.(CVE-2026-63076)\n\nA vulnerability was discovered in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. The vulnerability affects unknown processing logic of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=save_menu. Manipulation of the img parameter results in arbitrary file uploads. Attackers can launch attacks remotely. The exploit code for this vulnerability has been made public and may be exploited.(CVE-2026-75803)","modified":"2026-09-05T15:16:32.740367941Z","published":"2026-09-05T15:03:16Z","upstream":["CVE-2026-63074","CVE-2026-63076","CVE-2026-75803"],"database_specific":{"severity":"High"},"references":[{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://www.openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail/?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3625"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63074"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63076"},{"type":"ADVISORY","url":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75803"}],"affected":[{"package":{"name":"openssl","ecosystem":"openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3","purl":"pkg:rpm/openEuler/openssl&distro=openEuler-24.03-LTS-SP3"},"ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3"}]}],"ecosystem_specific":{"aarch64":["openssl-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm","openssl-debuginfo-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm","openssl-debugsource-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm","openssl-devel-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm","openssl-libs-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm","openssl-perl-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.aarch64.rpm"],"noarch":["openssl-help-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.noarch.rpm"],"src":["openssl-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.src.rpm"],"x86_64":["openssl-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm","openssl-debuginfo-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm","openssl-debugsource-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm","openssl-devel-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm","openssl-libs-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm","openssl-perl-3.0.12-53.oe2403sp3.x86_64.rpm"]},"database_specific":{"source":"https://repo.openeuler.org/security/data/osv/OESA-2026-3625.json"}}],"schema_version":"1.9.0","severity":[{"type":"CVSS_V3","score":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H"}]}